Noori Law | A Boutique Family Law Firm - Professional. Knowledgable. Tenacious. Noori Law is a boutique law firm focused solely on the practice of Family Law. Hind Noori is dedicated to providing experienced, effective, cost-efficient and timely services within a client-centered framework. At Noori Law our goal is to provide the most comprehensive Family Law related legal advice to help our clients achieve their objectives. Hind Noori is committed to acting in the best interests of our clients, and their families, through tailored approaches and solutions.

Enter your keyword

Can a Child Refuse to See a Parent? How Do Ontario Courts Handle Visitation Disputes? 

Can a Child Refuse to See a Parent? How Do Ontario Courts Handle Visitation Disputes? 

Can a Child Refuse to See a Parent? How Do Ontario Courts Handle Visitation Disputes? 

A child refusing to see a parent is one of the most difficult issues that arises after separation. It is also one of the most misunderstood.

In Ontario, a child’s refusal does not automatically change parenting time or override an existing court order. It initiates an evidentiary analysis process, during which judges examine surrounding circumstances, including family dynamics, caregiving history, and any factors influencing the child’s position.

Parenting disputes are governed by the best interests of the child framework under the Divorce Act and the Children’s Law Reform Act. Ontario courts focus on safety, stability, and the child’s relationship with each parent over time. 

Legal framework Ontario courts apply in visitation disputes

Judges look at whether the arrangement protects stability in the child’s school routine and community ties, maintains connections with extended family, supports mental health and developmental needs, and reflects past compliance with parenting arrangements.

Here are key facts courts tend to examine:

  • History of parenting time: consistency of contact, missed visits, and whether refusal started suddenly or grew over time.
  • Caregiving pattern before separation: who handled day to day routines, school needs, medical appointments, and emotional support.
  • Child’s stated reasons: whether reasons are specific and age appropriate, or vague and adult like.
  • Safety concerns: any allegations of family violence, intimidation, substance issues, or emotional harm, plus whether evidence supports those concerns.
  • Parental conduct: whether either parent discourages contact, undermines the other parent, or places the child in the middle of conflict.
  • Conflict exposure: the extent to which the child witnesses arguments, court disputes, or disparaging comments.
  • Independent corroboration: information from school, health records, neutral witnesses, or other reliable sources.

Courts also pay close attention to how each parent responds once refusal happens. A parent who treats refusal as a reason to stop access without attempting reasonable repair can face credibility concerns. A parent who pressures the child without regard for distress can also undermine their position. 

Two kids are playing in a park on a sunny day.

How much weight does a child’s voice carry? 

While Ontario courts don’t recognize a fixed age at which a child can refuse parenting time, officials analyse based on maturity, judgment, and the reliability of the child’s expressed views. 

They assess whether the child can articulate reasons grounded in lived experience and if the views are consistent over time. As children grow older, their preferences may carry greater evidentiary weight, particularly where enforcement would undermine emotional stability or damage the parent child relationship.

Even then, preference does not displace the legal test. 

How are visitation disputes analysed? 

Judicial decisions remain evidence driven and courts often rely on neutral professional input to understand the cause and the impact.

Courts may consider:

  • involvement of the Office of the Children’s Lawyer to represent the child’s interests or provide a clinical investigation
  • Section 30 assessments under the Children’s Law Reform Act, where a clinician evaluates parenting capacity, relationships, and the child’s needs
  • therapist or counsellor input where the child is already receiving support
  • school or third party observations that provide context on behaviour and emotional state

How do Ontario courts respond when a child resists parenting time? 

There’s no fixed single outcome as the focus is on restoring stability while protecting the child’s emotional and physical safety.

Possible court responses include: 

  • maintain the existing parenting order where refusal appears situational or recent
  • adjust the parenting schedule to reduce pressure and rebuild contact gradually
  • order therapeutic intervention to support the parent child relationship
  • involve the Office of the Children’s Lawyer or a Section 30 assessment for independent input
  • enforce parenting orders where non compliance is driven by a parent rather than the child
  • restrict or supervise parenting time in cases with substantiated safety concerns

Parenting Time Disputes and High Conflict Litigation in Ontario

Visitation disputes require careful legal strategy, as courts focus on evidence, family dynamics, and the child’s best interests rather than assumptions or pressure.Noori Law represents parents in complex parenting disputes across Ontario and brings experience in managing high conflict files with sensitivity and precision. Schedule a consultation to understand your next steps.

Hind went to law school at the University of Alberta. She has an undergraduate degree in Sociology from Dalhousie University and an undergraduate degree in Biology from Brock University.